. R A ] 4 J an 2 00 6 POSET REPRESENTATIONS OF DISTRIBUTIVE SEMILATTICES
نویسنده
چکیده
We prove that for any distributive ∨, 0-semilattice S, there are a meet-semilattice P with zero and a map µ : P × P → S such that µ(x, z) ≤ µ(x, y) ∨ µ(y, z) and x ≤ y implies that µ(x, y) = 0, for all x, y, z ∈ P , together with the following conditions: (i) µ(v, u) = 0 implies that u = v, for all u ≤ v in P. (ii) For all u ≤ v in P and all a, b ∈ S, if µ(v, u) = a ∨ b, then there are a positive integer n and a decomposition u = x 0 ≤ x 1 ≤ · · · ≤ xn = v such that µ(x i+1 , x i) lies either below a or below b, for all i < n. (iii) The subset {µ(x, 0) | x ∈ P } generates the semilattice S. Furthermore, any finite, bounded subset of P has a join, and P is bounded in case S is bounded. Furthermore, the construction is functorial on lattice-indexed diagrams of finite distributive ∨, 0, 1-semilattices.
منابع مشابه
3 N ov 2 00 7 POSET REPRESENTATIONS OF DISTRIBUTIVE SEMILATTICES
We prove that for every distributive ∨, 0-semilattice S, there are a meet-semilattice P with zero and a map µ : P × P → S such that µ(x, z) ≤ µ(x, y) ∨ µ(y, z) and x ≤ y implies that µ(x, y) = 0, for all x, y, z ∈ P , together with the following conditions: (P1) µ(v, u) = 0 implies that u = v, for all u ≤ v in P. (P2) For all u ≤ v in P and all a, b ∈ S, if µ(v, u) ≤ a ∨ b, then there are a pos...
متن کاملar X iv : m at h / 06 01 05 8 v 2 [ m at h . R A ] 1 3 Fe b 20 06 POSET REPRESENTATIONS OF DISTRIBUTIVE SEMILATTICES
We prove that for any distributive ∨, 0-semilattice S, there are a meet-semilattice P with zero and a map µ : P × P → S such that µ(x, z) ≤ µ(x, y) ∨ µ(y, z) and x ≤ y implies that µ(x, y) = 0, for all x, y, z ∈ P , together with the following conditions: (i) µ(v, u) = 0 implies that u = v, for all u ≤ v in P. (ii) For all u ≤ v in P and all a, b ∈ S, if µ(v, u) = a ∨ b, then there are a positi...
متن کاملN ov 2 00 7 POSET REPRESENTATIONS OF DISTRIBUTIVE
We prove that for every distributive ∨, 0-semilattice S, there are a meet-semilattice P with zero and a map µ : P × P → S such that µ(x, z) ≤ µ(x, y) ∨ µ(y, z) and x ≤ y implies that µ(x, y) = 0, for all x, y, z ∈ P , together with the following conditions: (P1) µ(v, u) = 0 implies that u = v, for all u ≤ v in P. (P2) For all u ≤ v in P and all a, b ∈ S, if µ(v, u) ≤ a ∨ b, then there are a pos...
متن کاملRepresentations of Distributive Semilattices by Dimension Groups, Regular Rings, C*-algebras, and Complemented Modular Lattices
We study the relationships among existing results about representations of distributive semilattices by ideals in dimension groups, von Neu-mann regular rings, C*-algebras, and complemented modular lattices. We prove additional representation results which exhibit further connections with the scattered literature on these diierent topics.
متن کاملPoset representations of distributive semilattices
We prove that for every distributive 〈∨, 0〉-semilattice S, there are a meet-semilattice P with zero and a map μ : P × P → S such that μ(x, z) ≤ μ(x, y)∨μ(y, z) and x ≤ y implies that μ(x, y) = 0, for all x, y, z ∈ P , together with the following conditions: (P1) μ(v, u) = 0 implies that u = v, for all u ≤ v in P . (P2) For all u ≤ v in P and all a,b ∈ S, if μ(v, u) ≤ a ∨ b, then there are a pos...
متن کامل